interweb ink
news from around the web from people addicted to tech

Scientists Create Molecular Paper

by Jason Patocka April 14, 2010

Photo by Roy Kaltschmidt, Berkeley Lab Public Affairs

Photo by Roy Kaltschmidt, Berkeley Lab Public Affairs

Next to grilled cheese sandwiches and classic Zelda, building blocks were quite possibly the best creation known to childhood. I remember spending countless days sifting through a giant tub filled with assorted blocks trying to find the ideal piece. These days, my RSS stream is filled with news of labs building systems that scale our concept of blocks down into the realm of atoms and molecules.

This week, I was pleased to read that Berkeley Lab’s nanoscience analog of Mt. Olympus was trumpeting news of Ron Zuckerman and Ki Tae Nam’s ability to create ‘molecular paper’. In other words, a molecular version of the giant flat surfaces always required to build castles or moon bases upon.

Zuckerman has been a household name among nanotech and biotech scientists alike for some time. Now his list of admirable accomplishments include design of a programmable surface only two atoms thick. This isn’t the only approach for designing programmable surfaces at the nanoscale, as Caltech researcher Paul Rothemund has demonstrated with his DNA origami technique. Still, Zuckerman and Nam have greatly expanded the toolkit for building 2D and 3D nanoscale platforms by using Zuckerman’s hallmark peptide molecules instead of DNA.

Zuckerman’s method also has the benefit of being able to spontaneously assemble in water.

Potential applications abound for a surface that small, from ultra sensitive sensor platforms, to designer membranes, to potential uses in pharmaceuticals, and potentially more far reaching manufacturing goals that require atomically precise systems. In lay terms, this discovery provides an air traffic control system for molecules.

The Molecular Foundry is proving to be a hot spot for nanotechnology research, and is a great example of strategic science investment by the US Federal Governments Department of Energy. Investment that a highly competitive innovation economy desperately needs.

Its great to see investment pay off. I dare say its more exciting now than it ever was over the prospect of grilled cheese sandwiches.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Current
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter

6 Comments »

  1. How much is it?

    Comment by Brianna — March 24, 2010 @ 1:20 pm

  2. Neither HTC or Sprint have hinted at the price yet

    Comment by savanthongvanh — March 24, 2010 @ 1:33 pm

  3. 6 Megabits? In Hong Kong we already have 21 Megabits! and it's still considered 3.5G…our 4G speeds are forecasted to be in the range of 50Mbps!

    Comment by Max — March 24, 2010 @ 1:52 pm

  4. Max, yes, US speeds suck. According to Sprint their 4g speeds will average 3-6MB/s http://www.nextel.com/en/solutions/mobile_broad...

    Comment by savanthongvanh — March 24, 2010 @ 2:11 pm

  5. I'm still using dial up. Damn dats fasssssst

    Comment by 4gfool — March 25, 2010 @ 1:41 am

  6. Well, I've been obsessively checking every day, all day long for news of a 2.1 upgrade for my Hero. To be honest, I didn't think we would see a 4g phone until the end of the year. It may be impetuous and ridiculously optimistic, but I'm planning to buy the Evo for myself and my boyfriend just as soon as it hits the shelf. I've been waiting a long time for this kind of hardware on an Android device. I was an early adopter. I've had a G1, a myTouch and now a Hero. My dad has my boyfriend's old G1, My boyfriend and I both have Sprint Heros now. We had to switch networks when we couldn't get voice or data coverage in our home or offices. We have Clear Networks as an ISP, so I'm super psyched to see Sprint partnering with them. And I'm way excited about the possibility of simultaneous voice/data services. Anyway, glad to find a community like http://www.Evo4Gforum.net with full of people as anxious as I am for the release of the Evo.

    Comment by coolfx35 — April 5, 2010 @ 1:49 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress